Unlike ******** Photoshop, which runs on subscription, the ON1 products can be purchased with a one-time payment and you own them for life. It works both as a standalone application but also triggered from Photoshop, Lightroom or Capture One as a plugin. And they are also offering a number of options for fine tuning the results. However, most of the alternative photo enlargement programs are also working with jpg files, not just with raw files, even if they won't save them in raw, as Super Resolution does. The only difference is, they are mostly standalone applications, so if you’re post processing your photos in Photoshop, Super Resolution may seem more handy.
#ON1 RESIZE VS SOFTWARE#
There is plenty of alternative software out there doing the same job. What are the alternatives of Super Resolution? Otherwise, it looks like a feature that would have been a lot more useful 10-15 years ago. Then you could use the feature to enlarge the crops from those images.
Super Resolution could revive those photos, if you need to print them in a larger format.Īnother case when it would be useful is when you are shooting sports or wildlife and you don’t have lenses long enough. The Canon 20D was an extremely popular camera 17 years ago, but it only had 8 megapixels.
#ON1 RESIZE VS ARCHIVE#
It would be a nice and useful feature if you have lots of images shot on older digital cameras in your archive and you would like to offer them a second life, adapted to the present reality.
If you are shooting with a real camera, most of the dslr and mirrorless cameras launched in the past years have more than enough pixels to print the images even in large formats. Plus, it’s still a long process, so it’s against the purpose of a phone camera: instantly available and ready to post/upload/send. However, the details of images shot on phones are not that great, even in raw format, so enlarging them would only highlight those faults.
#ON1 RESIZE VS HOW TO#
If you are shooting with a phone and would like larger files, Super Resolution could help a bit, if the phone has the option to shoot raw and you figure out how to save it in this format. It does a nice job, but definitely not perfect. The quality of the enlarged files is still decreasing, even if you use some noise reduction and sharpening over the result. There are no options to fine tune the result, it’s a take it or leave it feature, at least for now (******** is probably saving some improvements for future updates). It’s only available for raw files, so if you try to enlarge a jpg file, it won’t work, or at least not yet. Right now, it’s only available in Photoshop, although there are plans to be introduced in Lightroom in the future. What are the Super Resolution disadvantages? This way, the quality would be much more acceptable. That’s why you should consider saving your enlarged and processed image at half the size provided by the Super Resolution feature, so it would only be double than the original. However, it won’t make miracles: your 10 megapixel photo won’t have the same quality when enlarged at 40 megapixels. It uses ********'s AI and machine learning platform. The new feature works better than just upsizing the image from the Image size. So, a 10 megapixel photo will become a 40 megapixel one, and the result will be saved as a raw. Then, click on Enhance again and the image will be enlarged by a factor of four: the size of each side will be doubled. While editing a raw image in Camera Raw, you can right click on it and choose Enhance. Here are my thoughts on Photoshop super resolution and alternatives for photo enlarging: Yet, having the early frustrations still in my mind, I was always interested in the ways I could upsize my images and not lose the quality. Later on, I lost count, but now I'm using a 30 megapixels camera and I really don't see much need for a higher resolution in 99.99% of the time. Newspapers back then used to print some nice first pages from those 3 megapixel photos.
However, the interpolation wasn't necessarily great, even by the standards of that time, so I was using it in the original resolution, mostly.
Then, in 2002, I bought a Fuji with 3 megapixels, capable of a 6 megapixels interpolation, and I thought I was really on to something. I remember the first digital camera I laid my hands on, back in the year 2000, was an Olympus which had only 1.3 megapixels.
0 kommentar(er)
